上海体育学院学报

2018, (06) 1-10

[打印本页] [关闭]
本期目录(Current Issue) | 过刊浏览(Past Issue) | 高级检索(Advanced Search)

国际体育仲裁机制的制度缺陷与改革路径——以佩希施泰因案件为视角
The Institutional Defects and Reform of the Mechanism of International Arbitration for Sport from the Perspective of the Pechstein Case

郭树理
GUO Shuli

摘要(Abstract):

德国慕尼黑地方法院与高等法院就佩希施泰因案件的二审裁决,严重质疑了体育仲裁院(CAS)设置的中立性与仲裁程序的公正性,对整个国际体育仲裁机制提出挑战,且这一质疑不会因德国联邦最高法院的改判以及欧洲人权法院对CAS的支持而消失。CAS必须与时俱进进行改革:改进国际体育仲裁理事会(ICAS)的人员组成及CAS仲裁员大名单人员的来源;改进CAS上诉仲裁庭首席仲裁员或独任仲裁员的选任方式;加强仲裁程序的改革;放宽法律援助制度;加强国家法院对仲裁裁决的司法审查。
The rulings by the Munich local court and the high court in the Pechstein Case called into question of the independence of the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), as well as of the fairness of arbitration procedure. And this challenge will not disappear with the reversed decision by the Germany Supreme Court. CAS must be reformed to keep on its step with the time. That is, the leader of the International Council of Sports (ICAS) and the CAS arbitrators list should have more representatives from the athletes and the independent third parties. The nomination methods of the chairman of the arbitration panel or the sole arbitrator shall be improved. The conditions for the application for the legal aids should be more flexible. The judicial review of the CAS arbitration awards should be reinforced. All the institution design should safeguard the fairness of the international sports arbitration mechanism.

关键词(KeyWords): 国际体育仲裁机构;体育仲裁院;佩希施泰因案件;体育纠纷;仲裁程序;法律援助
international sport arbitration organization;court of arbitration for sport;Pechstein case;sport dispute;arbitration procedure;legal aid

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 国家社会科学基金资助重大项目(16ZDA225);中国法学会部级法学研究课题(CLS(2016)D166)

作者(Author): 郭树理
GUO Shuli

Email:

参考文献(References):

扩展功能
本文信息
服务与反馈
本文关键词相关文章
本文作者相关文章
中国知网
分享